EXPANDING P&GJeannette Stanley

    curtisa.light
    Cross-Out

    Agenda

    ■ Chosen Country

    ■ Diamond of National Advantage Analysis

    ■ Success Analysis Forces

    ■ Hindrance Analysis Forces

    ■ Leadership Actions

    ■ Recommendation

    ■ Conclusion

    ■ References

    P&G in Zimbabwe■ There is no P&G location in

    Zimbabwe

    ■ P&G has a presence in the country

    ■ Low start up costs

    ■ Large earning potential

    Diamond of National Advantage

    Industry Rivalry

    ■ Multinational companies are eyeing the same market.

    ■ Locals companies pose a significant threat for Procter and Gamble.

    ■ Convenient small scale sellers do dominate a significant share of consumer goods in Zimbabwe .

    Demand Conditions

    ■ There is an increase in consumer goods like groceries.

    ■ People prefer to buy from retailers who are sensitive to their prices.

    ■ People demand to consume healthy consumer goods and are cautious about being exploited.

    Diamond of National Advantage

    Supporting Industries

    ■ The logistic industry is not as reliable as Procter and Gamble could wish.

    ■ The is banking industry that would support transaction purposes.

    ■ There is a private security firm that would offer good security to the premises of Procter and Gamble.

    Factors Endowment

    ■ Affordable labour is available from Zimbabwe people.

    ■ Procter and Gamble have a strong capital base and thus can finance its operations.

    ■ It is not as hard to set a strategic location to set up stores in Zimbabwe.

    Success Analysis Forces

    1. Increasing growth of the economy

    ■ The economy of Zimbabwe is growing faster than that of its neighbours.

    ■ This increase supports the consumption of more consumer goods for locals.

    ■ The higher consumption of consumer goods would facilitate the success of Procter and Gamble in Zimbabwe.

    2. Increasing purchasing power

    ■ With increasing economic actions, people's ability to buy is increasing (Bonga & Mugayi, 2018).

    ■ This implies that people would not mind paying higher prices for goods from Procter and Gamble.

    ■ Furthermore, they can buy more units per person.

    ■ This is a basic success factor for Procter and Gamble.

    Success Analysis Forces

    3. Improving political climate

    ■ The political climate is stabilizing in the country.

    ■ For the number of years that Procter and Gamble have operated there, it has operated a steady political climate.

    ■ This stable climate facilitates a suitable environment to do business from.

    Hindrance Analysis Forces

    1. Limited online footprint

    ■ Zimbabwe is growing in terms of digital migration, just like other countries.

    ■ This limits the ability of Procter and Gamble to reach customers over the digital space.

    2. Limited diversity

    ■ The company has not invested in so many products.

    ■ This implies it only attars a limited number of customers.

    ■ This also limits the profitability of the company.

    Hindrance Analysis Forces

    3. Uncertainty of regulations on foreign companies

    ■ The country is yet to establish a stable regulation pertaining regulation of foreign companies.

    ■ This poses risks for a government that would impose strict policies for foreign companies.

    ■ This would make it hard for Procter and Gamble to operate in Zimbabwe.

    4. Limited products

    ■ This implies that the company is likely to face stiff competition from locals and other foreign companies in the industry.

    ■ This would also reduce customers the satisfaction they would not find everything they need from one roof.

    ■ In the long run, these customers are likely to be lost to competitors who have more varieties of consumer goods.

    Leadership Action

    1. Engage locals at the executive positions

    ■ This is for a proper understanding of the buying culture (Foss & Pedersen, 2019).

    ■ Furthermore, this is to understand how locals can be triggered to buy more.

    ■ This would also create a good image of the company to locals so that they would buy more.

    2. Embrace decentralized management

    ■ The company should consider allowing managers in Zimbabwe to make their decentralized decisions.

    ■ This makes it more flexible for them to react to different market forces.

    ■ This would also enhance their proactive preparedness for different market changes.

    Leadership Action

    3. Engage staff in decision making

    ■ The company should consider involving different stakeholders in the process of making decisions.

    ■ This is to have them support decisions made.

    ■ Their supporting decision would facilitate the effective operation of Procter and Gamble in Zimbabwe.

    Recommendation

    i.) Engage more locals in strategic management

    ■ This would incline the strategic decision made and purchasing behaviours of locals.

    ■ This would also help t protect the interest of locals while doing business simultaneously.

    ii.) Consider Diversifying into more variety of products

    ■ This is to attract more customers (Guyader & Piscicelli, 2019).

    ■ This is also intended to increase shopping satisfaction since customers can get everything they need under one roof.

    Conclusion

    ■ In conclusion, expanding to Zimbabwe is a good decision by Procter and Gamble.

    ■ Expanding in this market is as attractive because of different success forces discussed above.

    ■ However, Procter must consider hardships and possible challenges and be ready for them.

    ■ Procter and Gamble should incorporate leadership strategies as suggested and discussed above in the expansion strategy.

    REFERENCES:

    Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Microfoundations in international management research: The case of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1594-1621.

    Bonga, W. G., & Mugayi, P. (2018). An Explanatory Analysis of the Potential Impact of Citizens’ Purchasing Power on Industry Revival in Zimbabwe. Researchjournali’s Journal of Economics, 6(4), 01-07.

    Guyader, H., & Piscicelli, L. (2019). Business model diversification in the sharing economy: The case of GoMore. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 1059-1069.

    • Slide 1
    • Agenda
    • P&G in Zimbabwe
    • Diamond of National Advantage
    • Diamond of National Advantage
    • Success Analysis Forces
    • Success Analysis Forces
    • Hindrance Analysis Forces
    • Hindrance Analysis Forces
    • Leadership Action
    • Leadership Action
    • Recommendation
    • Conclusion
    • REFERENCES:

                                                                                                                                      Order Now