Introduction |
|||
Main critique theme |
Critique theme is focused and clearly explained |
||
Significance |
Makes clear what motivates them to explore main theme/question and significance |
||
Background |
Explains background on the problem |
||
Body content and article evaluation |
|||
Overall |
each section of body content provides details of all 3 articles, articles are thoroughly but concisely compared, contrasted and evaluated clearly |
||
Introduce articles |
Give article details (citation), provide each paper's objective/hypotheses |
||
Article methods |
Methods summarized and evaluated completely for all 3 articles |
||
Article results |
Results are summarized and evaluated, tables/figures used from papers to help with critique |
||
Article discussions |
Discussions are summarized and thoroughly evaluated for all 3 articles |
||
Summary |
Summarizes strengths and weaknesses of each article, makes a concluding statement overall about the critique theme |
||
Speculation |
Suggests what should be done next, points out new questions raised by work |
||
Citation slide |
Any studies mentioned during the presentation are listed and all publication information given in a 'References' slide |
||
Organization of presentation |
|||
Purpose of slides |
Purpose of each slide is clear to the listener (title of slide contains premise) |
||
Continuity |
Effective transitions between slides contribute to a continuous sequence of connected ideas, slides flow well |
||
Roadmap |
Provides a roadmap/preview then several reminders/singpost during the talk so that the listener never feels lost |
||
Figures |
Every figure and image is clearly labeled and all figures are fully explained by the presenter |
||
Attractiveness |
slides are laid out well, text is easy to read and colors do not clash, there are no distracting transitions |
||
Timing |
15 min |
||