KIM WOODS 118

Week 2 – Discussion 1
1 1 unread reply. 1 1 reply.
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.
Construct a Deductively Valid Argument
You must post to this discussion on at least four separate days of the week and your posts must total at least 400 words as you address the questions. Your first post must be completed by Day 3 (Thursday) and the remainder of your posts must be completed by Day 7 (Monday). You must answer all aspects of the prompt at some point during the week. Also reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target and analyze things in as much detail as you can.
The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion counted together should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target and analyze things in as much detail as you can.
The topic of this week is deductive reasoning. Accordingly in this discussion your task is to create a deductively valid argument for your position (the same position that you defended in the Week One discussion).