Dimensions of Learning II

    EDU 503

    Belhaven University

    Unit 6

    Student Rights (from a Constitutional point of view)

    1

    Class Introduction

     Public school teachers provide a safe

    environment for learning. Teachers

    acknowledge and uphold students’

    inalienable rights operating in Loco Parentis

    within an educational context.

     Public school children do not have the same

    level of constitutional rights as adults where

    educators balance students’ rights together

    with the public school’s mission.

     Law is not an end but rather a ruler whereby

    an educator “mediates” within practice

    2

    Class Introduction – In Loco Parentis

     If an act of a student can interfere with the

    educational process, that act may, in many

    cases, be suppressed

     While a student is in the custody of a school,

    the school acts as “parent” and outside

    governmental “purview”

     We educators are committed to a citizenry of

    the constitutional idea of libertarian rights

    protected through law

    Topics we’ll cover (as introductory)

     Students’ constitutional rights in the public

    education classroom

     Teachers are representatives of the State and as

    such abide by School Board policy/handbook, that

    which is espoused from State government, and of

    course the Supreme Federal Constitution and law

    of the land which supersedes all other lawful

    tenants.

     Mississippi Teacher Code of Ethics

    4

    Class Objectives

     Become familiar with students’ Constitutional

    rights in the public school classroom.

     Become familiar with the public school

    teacher’s role in understanding and

    supporting student rights in an educational

    setting, always following School Board policy

    and those specifics as written in the district

    handbook and Constitutional rights.

    5

    Readings/Court Cases of Interest

     New Jersey v TLO

     Civil Rights Act of 1964

     Tinker v Des Moines

     Bethel School v Fraser

     Hazelwood School v Kuhlmeier

     Board v Barnette

     Keyishian v Board of Regents

    6

    Biblical Foundation

     Render therefore unto Caesar the things

    which are Caesar's; and unto God the things

    that are God’s. (King James Version: Matthew 22:21)

     Everyone must obey state authorities,

    because no authority exists without God's

    permission, and the existing authorities have

    been put there by God. (Good News Translation: Romans 13:1)

     As I have loved you, so you must love one

    another. (New International Version: John 13:34)

    7

    Religious Freedom

     School sponsorship of prayer is prohibited.

     Educators cannot use their authority/influence to

    lead devotion/religious activities – the degree of

    involvement is important.

     Schools cannot promote a religious faith;

    however, the Bible may be taught from a

    curriculum perspective (historical or cultural

    or literary).

     Students may practice their religious beliefs

    at school provided the educational

    environment is not disrupted.

    8

    Religious Freedom

     Teachers cannot proselytize to students.

     Teachers cannot lead devotions (clubs,

    graduation speeches, ball games, create prayer

    walls, etc. (teacher instituted action is prohibited

    and viewed as proselytizing).

    The Constitution does not prohibit public school students from voluntarily

    praying at schools; however, many schools prohibit students religiously

    proselytizing in graduation speeches and before ball games.

    Consider that most schools use “moment of silence” in avoiding appearance

    of “encouraging students” to pray

    9

    Test Your Knowledge:

     A student wears a Burka and/or Hijab

     Is this student likely in violation of a school’s dress

    code? Why/Why not?

     A student wears a cross necklace

     Is this a protected expression?

     You are a chorus teacher; can you

    incorporate religious song(s) in the

    curriculum?

    Freedom of Speech/Expression

     Founding Fathers penned the First Amendment to

    protect expressive activities. The Supreme Court

    has often applied the First Amendment’s

    protections broadly; however, student speech in

    schools is somewhat restricted and “not

    automatically coextensive with the rights of adults

    in other settings” (McCarthy, 2004).

     The classroom should be a place where “exchange

    of ideas” is supported and encouraged.

    11

     Example: students do not have to stand for the Pledge;

    this “expression” is a protected right

     Students express themselves through various forms of

    expression. (wear a political, ethnic or cultural, religious

    button/badge/emblem, etc.). Likewise, students have

    the right to refrain from expressing themselves.

    The educator may always regulate expression when

    there is educational concern (disruption of school,

    safety/health concerns, etc.), but there must be

    legitimate educational concerns.

    12

    Freedom of Speech/Expression –

    protected:

    Freedom of Speech/Expression –

    unprotected: Defamatory, obscene, inflammatory communication,

    vulgar expression, extreme disorderly conduct

     Reactions of the listeners and recipient

     Is it a repeat behavior (expression)

     Is it reasonable to assume violence will occur

    Consider the following:

    Poem, rap song, political speech, graduation speech, written letter,

    online post, creative writing assignment ….are not “blanket”

    protected.

    The Supreme Court recognizes need for proper decorum and

    complying with school rules as valid educational doctrine.

    School Boards through policy usually list prohibited manners of

    speech, and the School Board is a law-making body.

    Freedom of Speech/Expression – cont.

    unprotected:

     A school “publication” speech is NOT protected speech

    and may be censored if it does not represent

    consistency with school mission.

     Students may express their opinions on controversial

    issues; however, this is NOT protected expression if

    this substantially interferes with school operations,

    missions, or the rights of others. Likewise, student

    expressions off campus with a direct and detrimental

    impact on the school is NOT protected.

    Test Your Knowledge: A student walks quietly out of class as an

    expression of protest.

     Is this protected expression?

     A student wears a black armband to protest war.

     Is this protected expression?

     A student stands up in class and begins saying the

    Lord’s prayer.

     Is this protected expression?

     A student drives to school and his/her truck has a

    mounted Confederate Flag waving in the wind.

     Is this protected expression?

    Students have the right to gather, distribute petitions, to express their ideas in nondisruptive

    ways. 15

    16

     A student created a video circulating on

    multiple student phones where he/she is

    making derogatory remarks about a teacher

     Is this protected expression?

     A student wears a political button to class.

     Is this protected expression?

     A student asks to go pray; do you let them out

    of class?

     Is this protected expression? Students have the right to express their religion with other students before or after

    school or at lunch … as other student expression is not restricted to school matters.

    Religious expression is not “burdened more” than any other personal expression.

    Test Your Knowledge:

    "It can hardly be argued that either students or

    teachers shed their constitutional rights to

    freedom of speech or expression at the

    schoolhouse gate." (Tinker v Des Moines)

    Search and Seizure

     Rules are established for searches via School Board

    policy. In exercising “reasonableness” and upholding

    students’ rights, a classroom teacher should always let

    administration handle search. There is immediacy with

    safety and/health concerns, and the teacher is expected

    to act within teacher parameters as set in the handbook.

    Consider the following:

     Alerting administrators if theft is suspected in the classroom

     Alerting administrators if there are suspicions regarding backpack

    contents, contents in a vehicle, tobacco possession, etc.

     The classroom teacher does not search but follows

    policy.

    Freedom from Discrimination

     As an “agent” of the State, the classroom

    teacher does not discriminate. Federal law

    prohibits discrimination based on race, color,

    sex, religion, disability, and national origin.

     Safe Schools Improvement Act

    19

     Student handbooks are key; following policy

    is key

     Consistency in punishment

     Equal Access (14th Amendment)

     Property (right to education)

     Due process

    Freedom from Discrimination

    Student Rights – State Constitutional code MS Code § 37-9-59 (2013) (Grounds and procedure for dismissal or

    suspension of licensed employee)

     For incompetence, neglect of duty, immoral conduct, intemperance, brutal

    treatment of a pupil or other good cause, the superintendent of schools may

    dismiss or suspend any licensed employee in any school district. ….

     Examples of each:

     Incompetence – constantly late for work

     Neglect of duty – not following district policy, missing duty responsibility

     Immoral conduct – discussing adult weekend activities, actions and

    behaviors which could be deemed contrary to role model actions and

    behaviors, being charged with a crime

     Intemperance – smelling of alcohol, yelling (showing lack of restraint

    and control)

     Brutal treatment – not allowing a student to eat lunch, (corporal

    punishment is allowed in MS; however, school policy may

    prohibit; grabbing a student, etc.)

     Other good cause ….

    21

    Recap of the class

     Teachers follow district policy as set forth by

    School Board adopted policies and handbooks.

     Teachers abide within US Constitutional Rights

    as part of an educational practice.

     Teachers uphold State Constitutional

    educational code in carrying out duties as an

    agent of the state.

     Teachers are advocates for all people to

    further model and respect the guarantees of

    human rights and liberties of students.

    22

    Sources/Readings of Interest:

     https://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-

    documents/bill-of-rights/

     New Jersey v TLO

     Civil Rights Act of 1964

     Tinker v Des Moines

     Bethel School v Fraser

     Hazelwood School v Kuhlmeier

     Board v Barnette

     Keyishian v Board of Regents

    What’s next?

     Complete your detailed reading

     Answer the discussion questions

     Complete the writing assignments

    24

    References

    McCarthy, M. M., Cambron-McCabe, N. H., &

    Thomas, S. B. (2004). Legal rights of

    teachers and students. Upper Saddle

    River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    U.S. Constitution

    The State of Mississippi Constitution

    25

                                                                                                                                      Order Now