making a moral decision

Write 46 pages in which you invent a practical circumstance that illuminates differences between the three approaches to normative theory.
Suggested Resources
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Capella Multimedia
Click the links provided below to view the following multimedia pieces:
SHOW LESS
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course:
Assessment Instructions
For this assessment you will invent a practical circumstance of your own choosing that illuminates differences among the three approaches to normative theory; a circumstance in which the duties consequences and virtues do not align with each other. It does not need to be a grand controversial social issue; an everyday moral dilemma will make the conflict clearer. Just look for an example where doing your duty might cause lasting harm or where caring about people requires breaking the rules.
Write a paper addressing this topic supporting your statements with credible research on the three approaches to normative theory. You may begin your research with the Suggested Resources for this unit but you are also expected to conduct your own independent research into the scholarly and professional resources of the field.
Begin by describing a concrete situation that calls for someone to make an ethical decision about what to do. Choosing your example carefully will make it easier to draw an interesting contrast between the theoretical applications. Be sure to describe the situation with enough detail to provide adequate information for arriving at a responsible choice. You are welcome to choose a case in which you are personally involved but you may find it easier to think objectively with a little detachment.
Next think about the kinds of normative theory that could be applied to the situation you have chosen. If we are not to surrender to ethical relativism what should guide our decision hereduties outcomes or virtue? You should select the approaches in a way that heightens the dilemma of deciding on a course of action that would be right or wrong. Support your presentation by considering alternative ways of applying each theory to the case. Use your example to compare and contrast the theoretical approaches in practical terms.
Finally discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these normative theories as methods for making moral decisions in practical cases. Use what you have written about the application of each theory to your example as evidence of the merits of each way of thinking about everyday choices. What makes the most sense and how would you decide yourself? State your own position on which normative theory works best and defend that position with clear arguments in its support.
Additional Requirements
Making a Moral Decision Scoring Guide